PPPR-09

Are information security principles designed into the product lifecycle?

Explanation

This question is asking whether security considerations are integrated throughout your product development lifecycle, rather than being added as an afterthought. It's about 'security by design' - embedding security practices from the initial concept phase through development, testing, deployment, and maintenance. In a security assessment, this question helps evaluators understand if your organization has a mature approach to security that addresses risks at every stage of product development. Organizations that build security into their development processes tend to produce more secure products than those that try to bolt security on at the end. To best answer this question, you should describe your secure development lifecycle (SDLC) practices, including: 1. How security requirements are gathered and incorporated into initial designs 2. Security-focused code review processes 3. Security testing methodologies (like SAST, DAST, penetration testing) 4. How security is considered in deployment and operations 5. How security updates and patches are managed Provide specific examples of security activities at each phase of your development lifecycle, and mention any frameworks you follow (like Microsoft SDL, NIST, or OWASP).

Example Responses

Example Response 1

Yes, security principles are integrated throughout our product lifecycle In the planning phase, we conduct threat modeling sessions and define security requirements based on industry standards During development, we follow secure coding guidelines, conduct regular code reviews with security checkpoints, and use static application security testing (SAST) tools integrated into our CI/CD pipeline In the testing phase, we perform dynamic application security testing (DAST), regular penetration tests, and security-focused user acceptance testing Before deployment, we conduct security architecture reviews and vulnerability assessments Post-deployment, we have continuous monitoring, regular security assessments, and a defined process for security patches and updates Our entire approach is aligned with the NIST Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF).

Example Response 2

Yes, our organization has implemented a comprehensive Secure Development Lifecycle (SDL) based on Microsoft's SDL framework Security requirements are defined at the project initiation stage through threat modeling and risk assessment activities Our developers receive annual secure coding training and utilize pre-approved, security-vetted libraries and components We've integrated automated security scanning tools (SonarQube and Checkmarx) into our development pipeline that block builds with critical security issues Before each major release, we conduct third-party penetration testing, and our security team performs a final security review We maintain a vulnerability management program with defined SLAs for patching based on severity, and we conduct quarterly security reviews of our production environment.

Example Response 3

No, we currently don't have formalized security principles designed into our product lifecycle While we do conduct security testing before major releases and respond to security issues when identified, security is not systematically integrated into each phase of development We recognize this as a gap in our process and are working to implement a more structured approach We've recently hired a security architect who is developing a secure development lifecycle framework that we plan to roll out in the next quarter In the meantime, we mitigate risk through regular vulnerability scanning of our production environment and prompt patching of identified issues.

Context

Tab: Organization
Category: Policies, Processes, and Procedures