GV.SC-05.088

Has your organization defined specific security requirements in service-level agreements (SLAs) that allow for monitoring supplier security performance throughout the relationship lifecycle?

Explanation

This question assesses whether your organization has established clear security metrics, performance indicators, and compliance requirements within your supplier SLAs. These defined requirements create accountability and provide a framework for ongoing security monitoring of third parties who may have access to your systems or data. For example, an SLA might specify required response times for security incidents, minimum security control standards, or compliance with specific regulations. Evidence could include sample SLAs with security clauses highlighted, a supplier security monitoring framework document, or reports showing regular security performance reviews against SLA metrics.

Implementation Example

Define security requirements in service-level agreements (SLAs) for monitoring suppliers for acceptable security performance throughout the supplier relationship lifecycle

ID: GV.SC-05.088

Context

Function
GV: GOVERN
Category
GV.SC: Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management
Sub-Category
Requirements to address cybersecurity risks in supply chains are established, prioritized, and integrated into contracts and other types of agreements with suppliers and other relevant third parties

ResponseHub is the product I wish I had when I was a CTO

Previously I was co-founder and CTO of Progression, a VC backed HR-tech startup used by some of the biggest names in tech.

As our sales grew, security questionnaires quickly became one of my biggest pain-points. They were confusing, hard to delegate and arrived like London busses - 3 at a time!

I'm building ResponseHub so that other teams don't have to go through this. Leave the security questionnaires to us so you can get back to closing deals, shipping product and building your team.

Signature
Neil Cameron
Founder, ResponseHub
Neil Cameron