Has your organization reviewed recent audit findings to verify that your cybersecurity strategy effectively ensures compliance with both internal policies and external regulatory requirements?
Explanation
Reviewers want evidence that you use audit findings to test your cybersecurity strategy, confirming it keeps you compliant with both internal policies and external regulations. Regular review of audit results helps identify compliance gaps, validate control effectiveness, and determine if your security approach meets both internal standards and external regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, or industry-specific requirements.
Evidence could include a formal audit findings report with management responses, a compliance gap analysis document, or meeting minutes from security governance committees where audit results were reviewed and remediation plans were discussed. These documents should show clear traceability between identified issues, compliance requirements, and any resulting strategic adjustments.
Implementation Example
Review audit findings to confirm whether the existing cybersecurity strategy has ensured compliance with internal and external requirements
ID: GV.OV-02.060
Context
- Function
- GV: GOVERN
- Category
- GV.OV: Oversight
- Sub-Category
- The cybersecurity risk management strategy is reviewed and adjusted to ensure coverage of organizational requirements and risks
Related questions
- Has your organization established metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of risk management decisions in achieving business objectives?
- Does your organization regularly review and adjust cybersecurity risk strategies that may be impeding business operations or innovation?
- Does your organization regularly evaluate the performance of cybersecurity roles to identify necessary policy improvements?
- Does your organization have a formal process to review and update its cybersecurity strategy following security incidents?
- Does your organization regularly review key performance indicators (KPIs) to verify that security policies and procedures are achieving their intended objectives?
- Does your organization regularly review key risk indicators (KRIs) to identify, assess, and prioritize cybersecurity risks based on their likelihood and potential impact?

