GV.RM-06.029

Has your organization established and implemented a standardized taxonomy of risk categories for consistent cybersecurity risk assessment and comparison?

Explanation

Using standardized risk categories enables organizations to effectively integrate risk data across different business units, compare risks using common terminology, and make informed decisions about risk prioritization. Without consistent categorization, organizations may struggle to aggregate risk information, potentially missing critical patterns or underestimating cumulative impacts of similar risks across different systems or departments. Evidence could include a documented risk taxonomy or categorization framework that defines risk categories (e.g., operational, technical, compliance, third-party) with descriptions and examples of each. This framework should be referenced in risk assessment documentation to demonstrate consistent application across the organization.

Implementation Example

Use a consistent list of risk categories to support integrating, aggregating, and comparing cybersecurity risks

ID: GV.RM-06.029

Context

Function
GV: GOVERN
Category
GV.RM: Risk Management Strategy
Sub-Category
A standardized method for calculating, documenting, categorizing, and prioritizing cybersecurity risks is established and communicated

ResponseHub is the product I wish I had when I was a CTO

Previously I was co-founder and CTO of Progression, a VC backed HR-tech startup used by some of the biggest names in tech.

As our sales grew, security questionnaires quickly became one of my biggest pain-points. They were confusing, hard to delegate and arrived like London busses - 3 at a time!

I'm building ResponseHub so that other teams don't have to go through this. Leave the security questionnaires to us so you can get back to closing deals, shipping product and building your team.

Signature
Neil Cameron
Founder, ResponseHub
Neil Cameron