ID.RA-05.163

Does your organization have a documented process for prioritizing cybersecurity investments based on risk assessment (likelihood and impact)?

Explanation

This question assesses whether the organization makes strategic decisions about cybersecurity spending based on quantifiable risk factors rather than arbitrary choices. Effective resource allocation requires understanding which threats are most likely to occur and would cause the greatest damage, allowing limited security budgets to address the most critical vulnerabilities first. Evidence could include a risk assessment framework document, meeting minutes from security investment planning sessions, or a prioritized security roadmap with justifications based on risk calculations. An ideal deliverable would be a risk register or matrix that shows how different security initiatives were ranked based on threat likelihood and potential business impact scores.

Implementation Example

Prioritize cybersecurity resource allocations and investments based on estimated likelihoods and impacts

ID: ID.RA-05.163

Context

Function
ID: IDENTIFY
Category
ID.RA: Risk Assessment
Sub-Category
Threats, vulnerabilities, likelihoods, and impacts are used to understand inherent risk and inform risk response prioritization

ResponseHub is the product I wish I had when I was a CTO

Previously I was co-founder and CTO of Progression, a VC backed HR-tech startup used by some of the biggest names in tech.

As our sales grew, security questionnaires quickly became one of my biggest pain-points. They were confusing, hard to delegate and arrived like London busses - 3 at a time!

I'm building ResponseHub so that other teams don't have to go through this. Leave the security questionnaires to us so you can get back to closing deals, shipping product and building your team.

Signature
Neil Cameron
Founder, ResponseHub
Neil Cameron