PR.DS-10.232

Does your organization have procedures to securely remove confidential data from processors and memory when it is no longer needed?

Explanation

This question assesses whether your organization implements proper data lifecycle management for sensitive information in active memory. Confidential data that remains in memory after it's no longer needed creates unnecessary security risks, as it could be exposed through memory scraping attacks, system crashes that generate memory dumps, or other memory-based vulnerabilities. Examples include clearing encryption keys after use, wiping authentication tokens after sessions end, or nullifying sensitive customer data after a transaction completes. Evidence could include documented procedures for secure memory management, code review guidelines that address memory clearing, technical specifications showing implementation of secure memory handling functions (e.g., use of SecureString in .NET, explicit memory zeroing in C/C++), or automated testing that verifies memory is properly cleared after sensitive operations.

Implementation Example

Remove data that must remain confidential (e.g., from processors and memory) as soon as it is no longer needed

ID: PR.DS-10.232

Context

Function
PR: PROTECT
Category
PR.DS: Data Security
Sub-Category
The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected

ResponseHub is the product I wish I had when I was a CTO

Previously I was co-founder and CTO of Progression, a VC backed HR-tech startup used by some of the biggest names in tech.

As our sales grew, security questionnaires quickly became one of my biggest pain-points. They were confusing, hard to delegate and arrived like London busses - 3 at a time!

I'm building ResponseHub so that other teams don't have to go through this. Leave the security questionnaires to us so you can get back to closing deals, shipping product and building your team.

Signature
Neil Cameron
Founder, ResponseHub
Neil Cameron