GV.RR-01.036

Does your organization conduct regular reviews to verify that individuals responsible for managing cybersecurity risk have appropriate authority and coordination mechanisms?

Explanation

This question assesses whether your organization has established clear lines of authority and effective coordination among cybersecurity stakeholders. Without proper authority, security personnel may be unable to implement necessary controls or respond to incidents effectively. Similarly, poor coordination can lead to security gaps, duplicated efforts, or inconsistent security practices across the organization. Evidence could include documentation of a governance structure (such as a RACI matrix for security responsibilities), minutes from cross-functional security committee meetings, formal delegation of authority documents, or results from governance effectiveness reviews that specifically address security authority and coordination.

Implementation Example

Conduct reviews to ensure adequate authority and coordination among those responsible for managing cybersecurity risk

ID: GV.RR-01.036

Context

Function
GV: GOVERN
Category
GV.RR: Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities
Sub-Category
Organizational leadership is responsible and accountable for cybersecurity risk and fosters a culture that is risk-aware, ethical, and continually improving

ResponseHub is the product I wish I had when I was a CTO

Previously I was co-founder and CTO of Progression, a VC backed HR-tech startup used by some of the biggest names in tech.

As our sales grew, security questionnaires quickly became one of my biggest pain-points. They were confusing, hard to delegate and arrived like London busses - 3 at a time!

I'm building ResponseHub so that other teams don't have to go through this. Leave the security questionnaires to us so you can get back to closing deals, shipping product and building your team.

Signature
Neil Cameron
Founder, ResponseHub
Neil Cameron