OPEM-01

Do you support role-based access control (RBAC) for system administrators?

Explanation

This question is asking whether your system supports Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) specifically for system administrators. RBAC is a method of regulating access to computer or network resources based on the roles of individual users within your organization. For system administrators, RBAC is particularly important because these users typically have elevated privileges that could potentially access sensitive data or make significant system changes. By implementing RBAC for administrators, you can ensure that each admin has only the specific permissions needed to perform their job functions, rather than giving all administrators full access to everything. This question is being asked in a security assessment because it relates to the principle of least privilege, which is a fundamental security concept. The PCI DSS standard (which governs payment card data security) specifically requires organizations to limit access rights to cardholder data to only those individuals whose job requires such access. RBAC helps enforce this requirement by ensuring administrators only have access to the systems and data they need. To best answer this question, you should: 1. Clearly state whether you do or do not support RBAC for system administrators 2. If you do support it, briefly explain how your RBAC implementation works 3. Mention any specific administrator roles you have defined and how permissions differ between them 4. Note any additional access control measures that complement your RBAC system

Example Responses

Example Response 1

Yes, our platform fully supports role-based access control (RBAC) for system administrators We have implemented a granular RBAC system where administrator accounts are assigned to specific roles such as Network Admin, Security Admin, Database Admin, and Application Admin Each role has carefully defined permissions that grant access only to the systems and data necessary for that specific administrative function For example, Database Admins can manage database configurations and performance but cannot modify network security rules, while Security Admins can manage firewall settings but cannot directly access customer data All administrative actions are logged and reviewed regularly, and we enforce periodic access reviews to ensure the principle of least privilege is maintained.

Example Response 2

Yes, we support RBAC for system administrators through our identity and access management platform Our system divides administrative functions into hierarchical tiers with progressively increasing privileges Tier 1 admins can view system status and perform basic troubleshooting, Tier 2 admins can make configuration changes and manage user accounts, while Tier 3 admins (limited to 3 individuals) have full system access Additionally, we implement just-in-time access for sensitive operations, requiring approval workflows before elevated privileges are temporarily granted This approach ensures administrators only have the minimum necessary access to perform their specific job functions, and all administrative actions are comprehensively logged for audit purposes.

Example Response 3

No, we currently do not support role-based access control specifically for system administrators Our current access control model uses a more traditional approach where system administrators are granted full administrative privileges to the systems they manage We recognize this is not ideal from a security perspective and doesn't align with PCI DSS requirements for least privilege access We are currently in the process of implementing a comprehensive RBAC solution that will be deployed within the next quarter In the interim, we mitigate risk through compensating controls including comprehensive logging of all administrator actions, multi-factor authentication requirements for administrative access, and weekly reviews of administrator activity logs.

Context

Tab
Case-Specific
Category
Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS)

ResponseHub is the product I wish I had when I was a CTO

Previously I was co-founder and CTO of Progression, a VC backed HR-tech startup used by some of the biggest names in tech.

As our sales grew, security questionnaires quickly became one of my biggest pain-points. They were confusing, hard to delegate and arrived like London busses - 3 at a time!

I'm building ResponseHub so that other teams don't have to go through this. Leave the security questionnaires to us so you can get back to closing deals, shipping product and building your team.

Signature
Neil Cameron
Founder, ResponseHub
Neil Cameron