GV.RR-03.042

Does your organization conduct periodic management reviews to verify that personnel with cybersecurity risk management responsibilities have appropriate authority to fulfill their duties?

Explanation

This question assesses whether your organization regularly evaluates if cybersecurity personnel have sufficient decision-making power and resources to effectively manage risks. Without proper authority, security teams may identify risks but lack the ability to implement necessary controls or influence business decisions, creating a gap between security requirements and actual implementation. Evidence could include documentation of management review meetings (minutes, action items), formal authority delegation documents, or organizational charts showing reporting structures and decision-making authority for security roles. These should demonstrate that authority levels are periodically assessed and adjusted as needed.

Implementation Example

Conduct periodic management reviews to ensure that those given cybersecurity risk management responsibilities have the necessary authority

ID: GV.RR-03.042

Context

Function
GV: GOVERN
Category
GV.RR: Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities
Sub-Category
Adequate resources are allocated commensurate with the cybersecurity risk strategy, roles, responsibilities, and policies

ResponseHub is the product I wish I had when I was a CTO

Previously I was co-founder and CTO of Progression, a VC backed HR-tech startup used by some of the biggest names in tech.

As our sales grew, security questionnaires quickly became one of my biggest pain-points. They were confusing, hard to delegate and arrived like London busses - 3 at a time!

I'm building ResponseHub so that other teams don't have to go through this. Leave the security questionnaires to us so you can get back to closing deals, shipping product and building your team.

Signature
Neil Cameron
Founder, ResponseHub
Neil Cameron